This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
View text chunked by:
- bekker page : bekker line
- book : chapter : section
The man that exceeds in
fearlessness not designated by any special name (and this the case with many of
the virtues and vices); he that exceeds in confidence is Rash; he that exceeds in
fear and is deficient in confidence is Cowardly.
[3]
In
respect of pleasures and pains—not all of them, and to a less degree in respect
of pains1—the observance of the mean is Temperance, the excess
Profligacy. Men deficient in the enjoyment of pleasures scarcely occur, and hence this
character also has not been assigned a name, but we may call it Insensible.
[4]
In regard to giving and getting money, the observance of the mean
is Liberality; the excess and deficiency are Prodigality and Meanness,2 but the prodigal man and the mean man exceed and
fall short in opposite ways to one another: the prodigal exceeds in giving and is
deficient in getting, whereas the mean man exceeds in getting and is deficient in giving.
[5]
For the present then we describe these qualities in
outline and summarily, which is enough for the purpose in hand; but they will be more
accurately defined later.
[6]
There are also other dispositions in relation to money, namely, the mode of observing the
mean called Magnificence (the magnificent man being different from the liberal,
as the former deals with large amounts and the latter with small ones), the
excess called Tastelessness or Vulgarity, and the defect called Paltriness. These are not the same as Liberality and the
vices corresponding to it; but the way in which they differ will be discussed
later.
[7]
In respect of honor and dishonor, the observance of the mean is Greatness of Soul, the
excess a sort of Vanity, as it may be called, and the deficiency, Smallness of Soul.
[8]
And just as we said that Liberality is related to
Magnificence, differing from it in being concerned with small amounts of money, so there
is a certain quality related to Greatness of Soul, which is concerned with great honors,
while this quality itself is concerned with small honors; for it is possible to aspire to
minor honors in the right way, or more than is right, or less. He who exceeds in these
aspirations is called ambitious, he who is deficient, unambitious; but the middle
character has no name, and the dispositions of these persons are also unnamed, except that
that of the ambitious man is called Ambitiousness. Consequently the extreme characters put
in a claim to the middle position, and in fact we ourselves sometimes call the middle
person ambitious and sometimes unambitious: