Ὀρφέα. For the legend of Orpheus and his wife Eurydice, see Paus. IX. 30, Virg. Georg. IV. 454 ff., Ovid Met. X. 1 ff. Phaedrus modifies the usual story (1) by making Eurydice a φάσμα, and Orpheus consequently ἀτελής (cp. Stesichorus' treatment of the Helen-legend, followed also by Euripides in his Helena, and Phaedrus 243 B): (2) by making O.'s descent an act of μαλακία rather than of τόλμα (as Hermesianax 2. 7, Ov. Met. X. 13 “ad Styga Taenaria est ausus descendere porta” ): (3) by representing O.'s death to be a penalty for this cowardice rather than for his irreverence to Dionysus (as Aeschylus Bassarai, etc.). For Orpheus and Orphism in general, see Miss J. Harrison Proleg. pp. 455 ff. ἅτε ὢν κιθαρῳδός. As if the “soft Lydian airs” of the cithara conduced to effeminacy. For the cithara, as distinguished from the λύρα, see Rep. 399 D—E (with Adam's note). It is worth noticing that Spenser (H. to Love) cites Orpheus as an instance of ἔνθεος τόλμα—“Orpheus daring to provoke the yre Of damned fiends, to get his love retyre.” τοιγάρτοι διὰ ταῦτα. Cp. Isocr. VII. 52, Andoc. I. 108, Dem. XXIII. 203; an example of the rhetorical trick of amplitude. Phaedrus, as Hug observes, is blind to the obvious corollary that Eros sometimes fails to implant τόλμα.
This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.