previous next
[126] Phillips introduced them to the convention in an earnest and conciliatory speech. Linus Child at once objected to the amendment that it was superfluous, being the same in substance as the committee's report, which sufficiently covered the ground.1 C. F. Adams, whose speech was heartily cheered, expressed his earnest desire both for a union of the party and a union founded on principle, and advocated resolutions which, instead of repeating old commonplaces, met the new state of affairs. His remarks were a reply to Winthrop's speech and to Child's objection to Phillips's resolutions, and criticised sharply the committee's report. The convention was by this time pervaded by deep feeling. The earnestness of the speakers, the personalities open and covert, what was said, and what though unsaid was implied, combined to intensify the excitement. It was the first conflict within the party in which the two opposing sections had met face to face; and the result was doubtful. The passion was not confined to the platform, but was shown on the floor in sullen countenances and angry voices. There was some confusion, and there were fears that the body would break up in disorder. The fate of Philips's amendment was uncertain; but it seemed likely to pass. It was opposed by many active politicians, and found little favor with the delegates from Boston; but it received general support from the country delegates. The four leaders who sustained it—Sumner, Phillips, Adams, and Allen —were a combination of personal power and capacity for debate which found no serious obstruction save in Winthrop. At this juncture Lawrence, Winthrop, Child, and other prominent Whigs were seen to be anxiously conferring, and immediately at their instance Fletcher Webster left the hall. Soon he came back, and whispered to Lawrence, who went out, and shortly returned leading Daniel Webster by the arm. The scene is still vividly remembered by men now old, or middle aged, who were then young. The great orator, endowed with a marvellous presence, such as has been the gift of no other, ancient or modern, walked slowly the length of the hall, the delegates parting as he advanced, and took his seat near the platform. The whole

1 Child was a delegate from Lowell, to which city he had recently removed from Worcester to become the manager of some mills. While living at Worcester and representing that county in the State Senate he had taken very radical ground against the annexation of Texas, maintaining that if Texas were annexed by legislation, it should be excluded by legislation. Judge Allen referred to this change of position as connected with a change of residence, and Child defended himself with considerable warmth.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Places (automatically extracted)

View a map of the most frequently mentioned places in this document.

Sort places alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a place to search for it in this document.
Worcester (Massachusetts, United States) (2)
Lowell (Massachusetts, United States) (1)

Download Pleiades ancient places geospacial dataset for this text.

hide People (automatically extracted)
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: