previous next

As soon as the election was announced the Free Soilers in mass sought Sumner at his house, and not finding him there, went to the house of Mr. Adams in Mt. Vernon Street, who answering to a call said that ‘he was glad of an opportunity to be able to congratulate his friends upon the glorious triumph of liberty in the election.’ Next they proceeded to the house of Richard h. Dana, Sr., in West Cedar Street, where they expected to find his son; but the son not being there, the venerable poet told them that he himself ‘had kept his bed until noon through illness, but on hearing the news he had suddenly become better.’1

Sumner heard the news of his election about three in the afternoon, while dining at Mr. Adams's house, which was within almost a minute's walk from the State House. Mr. Adams's son Charles Francis, since well known to the country, has supplied this account of the manner in which Sumner received the tidings—

At that time I was about sixteen years of age. In common with all the members of my father's family, I was intensely interested in the election of Mr. Sumner, who was at that time very intimate at my father's house. It was his custom to dine there, I should say, at least as often as once a week. The election had been dragging along all through the winter, and owing to the fugitive-slave excitement it was well known to have reached a climax early in April. I found my way into the gallery of the house of Representatives on the morning of the day before the final election took place, when the first ballot was going on. I remember very well the bustle and excitement of the time, and the crowded condition of the gallery. There was a dispute over the counting of the vote, and a majority and a minority report. When the majority report was declared, giving Mr. Sumner his election, I slipped down from the place and immediately went down to his office in Court Street. I ran upstairs, and found him just coming out of the office, and at once told him of the result and of his election. He took the matter very quietly indeed; and he and I walked up to my father's house together, it being then about our dinner hour,—half past 2 o'clock. The matter of the disputed ballot was discussed, and the opinion seemed to be that, according to the precedents of the session, the blank vote, I think it was, would not be counted. However, the matter was decided otherwise, and that ballot went for nothing.2 The next day the interest was very great, as it was perfectly well known that the vote would be very close. Mr. Sumner again came to

1 Mr. Dana (the father) said to Sumner, a few days later, ‘This election is gall and bitterness to some people.’ Sumner replied, ‘That occurred to me; but I at once suppressed all feeling of triumph.’

2 This ballot bore Sumner's name in print, crossed with faint pencil—marks, and underneath was that of ‘John mills’ in pencil. The Free Soilers consented unanimously to have it counted for Mills, who had only one other vote.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Places (automatically extracted)

View a map of the most frequently mentioned places in this document.

Download Pleiades ancient places geospacial dataset for this text.

hide People (automatically extracted)
Sort people alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a person to search for him/her in this document.
Charles Sumner (9)
John Quincy Adams (3)
Richard Henry Dana (2)
Henry Richard (1)
Mills (1)
Charles Francis (1)
hide Dates (automatically extracted)
Sort dates alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a date to search for it in this document.
April (1)
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: