by Parliament was unconstitutional.1
morning the consignees jointly gave as their answer: ‘It is utterly out of our power to send back the teas; but we now declare to you our readiness to store them until we shall receive further directions from our constituents;’2
that is, until they could notify the British Government
The wrath of the Meeting was kindling, when the Sheriff
entered with a Proclamation from the Governor
, ‘warning, exhorting and requiring them, and each of them there unlawfully assembled, forthwith to disperse, and to surcease all further unlawful proceedings at their utmost peril.’
The words were received with hisses, derision, and a unanimous vote not to disperse.
‘Will it be safe for the consignees to appear in the Meeting?’
; and all with one voice responded, that they might safely come and return; but they refused to appear.
In the afternoon Rotch
the owner, and Hall
the master of the Dartmouth
, yielding to an irresistible impulse, engaged that the tea should return as it came, without touching land or paying a duty.
A similar promise was exacted of the owners of the other tea-ships whose arrival was daily expected.
In this way ‘it was thought the matter would have ended.’3
‘I should be willing to spend my fortune and life itself in so good a cause,’4
, and this sentiment was general; they all voted ‘to carry their Resolutions into effect at the risk of their lives and property.’