[484b]
the unjust life requires us to discuss.”
“What, then,” he said, “comes next?”
“What else,” said I, “but the next in order?
Since the philosophers are those who are capable of apprehending that which
is eternal and unchanging,1
while those who are incapable of this but lose themselves and wander2 amid the
multiplicities of multifarious things, are not philosophers, which of the
two kinds ought to be the leaders in a state?” “What,
then,” he said, “would be a fair statement of the
matter?” “Whichever,” I said,
“appear competent to guard the laws and pursuits of society,
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.