previous next

[15] ἐπέπλως. We find this form, which is a simple non-thematic aorist, parallel with later forms such as “ἐπιπλώσας Il.3. 47; “πλῶον Il.21. 302, which point to a present in “-ω. Ἐπέπλως” may be one of the so-called Denominative verbs, ‘formed from nouns, by means of a suffix which has amalgamated with the final vowel of the noun Theme,’ Monro, H. G. § 19. See Curt. Verb. 133. This direct derivation from “πλόος” would account for the quantity of the vowel. Καί here gives just the same emphasis, as in “καὶ ἠματίη ὑφαίνεσκεν”, sup. 2. 104.

πύθηαι. For the use of the subjunctive after an aorist cp. Od.6. 173; 8.580; 11.94; 13. 303; 14. 328; 16. 234; 24. 360; Il.5. 128; 9.98. The construction may be explained in two ways, either that the governing aorist has a present or strong perfect sense, or more likely, that the purpose described by the final conjunction and the verb is still being worked out.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (7 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (7):
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: