“Having sprung of such parentage （ἐκφὺς, whereas φύς would be merely ”having been born such “） I will never afterwards prove （ἐξέλθοιμι, evadam, cp. 1011） another man ” （ἄλλος, i.e. false to my own nature）. The text is sound. The license of ποτ᾽ at the beginning of 1085 is to be explained on essentially the same principle as μέλας δ᾽ ι, etc. （29, cp. 785, 791） at the end of a verse; viz. that, where the movement of the thought is rapid, one verse can be treated as virtually continuous with the next: hence, too, Soph. Aj. 986 “οὐχ ὅσον τάχος ι δῆτ᾽ αὐτὸν ἄξεις δεῦρο”: Soph. Phil. 66 “εἰ δ᾽ ἐργάσει ι μὴ ταῦτα.” So here Soph. has allowed himself to retain ἔτι ι ποτέ in their natural connexion instead of writing ἔτι ι ἄλλος ποτ᾽. The genuineness of ποτ᾽ is confirmed by the numerous instances in which Soph. has combined it with ἔτι, as above, 892, below, 1412: Soph. Aj. 98, 687: Soph. Trach. 830, 922.
This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.