Hide browse bar Your current position in the text is marked in blue. Click anywhere in the line to jump to another position:
part:
chapter:
DEFINITIONS
SYNTAX OF THE SIMPLE SENTENCE
KINDS OF SIMPLE SENTENCES
EXPANSION OF THE SIMPLE SENTENCE
AGREEMENT: THE CONCORDS
THE SUBJECT
OMISSION OF THE SUBJECT
CASE OF THE SUBJECT: THE NOMINATIVE
THE PREDICATE
CONCORD OF SUBJECT AND PREDICATE
PECULIARITIES IN THE USE OF NUMBER
PECULIARITIES IN THE USE OF GENDER
PECULIARITIES IN THE USE OF PERSON
ADJECTIVES
ADVERBS
THE ARTICLE
—
ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT
PRONOUNS
THE CASES
PREPOSITIONS
THE VERB: VOICES
VERBAL NOUNS
THE PARTICIPLE
VERBAL ADJECTIVES IN
-τέος
SUMMARY OF THE FORMS OF SIMPLE SENTENCES
COMPOUND AND COMPLEX SENTENCES: COÖRDINATION AND SUBORDINATION
SYNTAX OF THE COMPOUND SENTENCE
SYNTAX OF THE COMPLEX SENTENCE
CLASSES OF SUBORDINATE CLAUSES
ADVERBIAL COMPLEX SENTENCES
(
2193
-
2487
)
ADJECTIVE CLAUSES
(
RELATIVE CLAUSES:
2488-
2573
)
DEPENDENT SUBSTANTIVE CLAUSES
(
2574
-
2635
)
INTERROGATIVE SENTENCES (QUESTIONS)
INDIRECT (DEPENDENT) QUESTIONS
EXCLAMATORY SENTENCES
NEGATIVE SENTENCES
PARTICLES
SOME GRAMMATICAL AND RHETORICAL FIGURES
This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
Part I: Letters, Sounds, Syllables, Accent
Part II: Inflection
Part IV: Syntax
ADVERBIAL COMPLEX SENTENCES
(
2193
-
2487
)
ADJECTIVE CLAUSES
(
RELATIVE CLAUSES:
2488-
2573
)
[*] 2668. After verbs of saying, knowing, seeing, making known, perceiving, etc. (but not after verbs of asking) the simple relatives are found where the indefinite relatives (or the interrogatives) might stand in an indirect question. Where ὅς is so used, it has the force of οἷος (cp. qualis in such questions); and rarely follows a negative clause, because verbs denoting lack of knowledge are allied in meaning to verbs of asking. The usual forms are e.g. οἶδά σε ὃς εἶ and οὐκ οἶδά σε ὅστις εἶ. But we find οἶδά σε ὅστις εἶ and οὐκ οἶδά σε ὃς εἶ. Thus, ““πέμπει . . . εἰπὼν ὃς ἦν” he sends . . . telling who he was” X. C. 6.1.46 (here ἦν represents the point of view of the writer), ““ἐκέλευσε . . . δεῖξαι ὃς εἴη” he ordered him to explain who he was” D. 52.7, μήποτε γνοίης ὃς εἶ mayest thou never come to know who thou art S. O. T. 1068, ὁρᾷς ἡμᾶς, ὅσοι ἐσμέν; do you see how many there are of us? P. R. 327c. So with the adverbs ἔνθα, οὗ, ᾗ, ὡς, ὅθεν; as ““τὴν ὁδὸν ὁδὸν ἔφραζεν ᾗ εἴη” he told where the road was” X. A. 4.5.34. In some cases these sentences may be exclamatory (2685). a. That the simple relatives are never thus used after verbs of asking indicates that such clauses are not true indirect questions (as in Latin), and that the pronouns have their value as relatives. But some scholars allow an indirect question after all these words except ὅς; and others admit no such limitation. b. Only in late Greek are the pronouns or adverbs of the indirect form used in direct questions. c. ὅπως is used occasionally (often in poetry) in the sense of ὡς. Thus, μή μοι φράζ᾽ ὅπως οὐκ εἶ κακός tell me not that (lit. how) thou art not vile S. O. T. 548. d. The context must sometimes determine whether a sentence is an indirect question or a relative clause. Thus, without the context, οὐκ εἶχον ὅποι ἀποσταῖεν (X. H. 3.5.10) might mean they did not know to whom ( = ἠγνόουν πρὸς τίνας) to revolt or they had no allies to whom ( = πρὸς οὕς) to revolt. But the present or aorist optative in relative final clauses is rare; cp. 2554 c.
American Book Company, 1920.
The National Endowment for the Humanities provided support for entering this text.
Purchase a copy of this text (not necessarily the same edition) from Amazon.com