William Watson Goodwin, Syntax of the Moods and Tenses of the Greek Verb, chapter 606

Home Collections/Texts Perseus Catalog Research Grants Open Source About Help

Hide browse bar Your current position in the text is marked in blue. Click anywhere in the line to jump to another position:

This text is part of:

Greek and Roman Materials

View text chunked by:

chapter : section : chapter
chapter

Table of Contents:

Use of the Moods.

Section I: The Potential Optative and Indicative.

I. Potential Optative.

II. Potential Indicative.

Imperative in Commands, etc.

First Person of Subjunctive as Imperative.

Imperative and Subjunctive in Prohibitions.

Independent Subjunctive with μή Implying Fear (Homeric).

Subjunctive with μή and μὴ οὐ in Cautious Assertions.

Indicative with μή and μὴ οὐ in Cautious Assertions.

ὅπως and ὅπως μή with the Independent Future Indicative, etc.

Section III: Subjunctive, like the Future Indicative, in Independent Sentences.—Interrogative Subjunctive.

Interrogative Subjunctive.

Section IV: οὐ μή with the Subjunctive and the Future Indicative.

Section V.: Final and Object Clauses after ἵνα, ὡς, ὅπως, ὄφρα , and μή .

Development of Clauses with ἵνα, ὡς, ὅπως, ὄφρα , and μή .

Pure Final Clauses.

ἄν , or κέ , in Final Clauses with Subjunctive.

ἄν , or κέ , in Final Clauses with Optative.

Elliptical Constructions.

Secondary Tenses of Indicative in Final Clauses.

Object Clauses with ὅπως and ὅπως μή after Verbs of Striving, etc.

Homeric and other Early Usages.

ὅπως ἄν , in Attic Greek and Herodotus.: ὡς , and ὡς ἄν , in Xenophon.

Negative Object Clauses.

ὅπως , after Verbs of Asking, Commanding, etc.

Object Infinitive and Indirect Questions.

Aorist Subjunctive in -σω and -σωμαι -- Dawes's Canon.

Clauses with μή after Verbs of Fearing, etc.

Section VI: Conditional Sentences.

Classification of Conditional Sentences.

I. Four Forms of Ordinary Conditions: (a) Present and Past Conditions.

(b) Future Conditions.

II. Present and Past General Suppositions.

Origin of the Greek Conditional Sentence.—Early Combinations of εἰ with κέ or ἄν .

I. Four Forms of Ordinary Conditional Sentences: (a) Present and Past Conditions.

2. With Supposition contrary to Fact.

Homeric Peculiarities.

Homeric Usages in Herodotus and in Attic Greek.

(b) Future Conditions: 1. Subjunctive or Future Indicative in Protasis with a future Apodosis.

Homeric Peculiarities.

2. Optative in Protasis and Apodosis.

Homeric Peculiarities.

II. Present and Past General Suppositions.

Homeric and Other Poetic Peculiarities.

Peculiar Forms of Conditional Sentences: Substitution and Ellipsis in Protasis.—Protasis without a Verb.

Substitution and Ellipsis in Apodosis.

Apodosis contained in the Protasis.

εἰ after Expressions of Wonder, Indignation, etc.

Mixed Constructions.

I. Optative in Protasis, with Future or Present Indicative or an equivalent form in Apodosis.

II. Indicative or Subjunctive in Protasis, with Potential Optative or Indicative in Apodosis.

III. Potential Optative or Indicative (with ἄν ) in the Protasis.

IV. Irregular Combinations.—Present or Past with Future in one Protasis.

V. Several Protases in one Sentence.

δέ, ἀλλά , and αὐτάρ in Apodosis.

Section VII: Relative and Temporal Sentences.

Relative with Definite Antecedent.

Relative with Indefinite Antecedent. —Conditional Relative.

I. Four Forms of Ordinary Conditional Relative Sentences.

(a) Present and Past Conditions.

(b) Future Conditions.

II. General Conditional Relative Sentences.

Homeric and other Poetic Peculiarities in Conditional Relative Sentences: Subjunctive without κέ or ἄν .

Relative with κέ or ἄν and the Optative in Conditions.

Homeric Similes with Ὡς etc.

ὅ τι μή and ὅσον μή without a Verb.

Special Forms of Antecedent Clause.

Mixed Conditional Constructions.

Assimilation in Conditional Relative Clauses.

δέ in the Antecedent Clause.

Final Relative Clauses Expressing Purpose.

Consecutive Relative Clauses Expressing Result. -- Causal Relative.

Consecutive Clauses with ὥστε or ὡς and with ἐφ᾽ ᾧ or ἐφ᾽ ᾧτε .

ὥστε with the Infinitive.

ὥστε with the Finite Moods.

ὥστε with the Participle.

ὡς used like ὥστε .

ἐφ᾽ ᾧ and ἐφ᾽ ᾧτε with the Infinitive and the Future Indicative.

Temporal Particles signifying Until and Before.: ἕως , ὄφρα, εἰς ὅ or εἰσόκε, ἔστε, ἄχρι, μέχρι , until.

πρίν , before, until: Meaning and General Use of πρίν .

Development of the Constructions with πρίν .

πρίν with the Infinitive.

πρίν with the Indicative.

πρίν with the Subjunctive and Optative: Subjunctive.

πρίν with Subjunctive in General Suppositions.

πρὶν ἤ, πρότερον ἤ , and πάρος , in the sense of πρίν .

πρίν (as Adverb), πάρος, πρότερον, πρόσθεν , etc., before πρίν , in the Leading Sentence.

Section VIII: Indirect Discourse or Oratio Obliqua, including Indirect Quotations and Questions.

General Principles of Indirect Discourse.

Simple Sentences in Indirect Discourse: Indicative and Optative after ὅτι and ὡς , and in Indirect Questions.

Subjunctive or Optative representing the Interrogative Subjunctive.

Indicative or Optative with ἄν .

Infinitive in Indirect Discourse.

Participle in Indirect Discourse.

Indirect Quotation of Complex Sentences.

Single Dependent Clauses in Indirect Discourse.

οἶδ᾽ ὅτι , without a Verb.

ὅπως, ὅ, οὕνεκα , and ὁθούνεκα , in Indirect Quotations.

ὅτι , before Direct Quotations.

Section IX: Causal Sentences.

Section X: Expression of a Wish.

Wishes Referring to the Future.

Wishes (Not Attained) in Present or Past Time.

view as XML

[*] 606. As the regular negative of the infinitive after ὥστε is μή, so that of the indicative and potential optative is οὐ. In DEM. xix. 218 we have ὥστε μήτε . . . μήτε . . . μήτε . . . ἀλλὰ καὶ . . . εἶτα τὴν εἰρήνην ἐποιήσασθε ἀγαπητῶς, where the force of a preceding εἰ seems really to govern the verb, that of ὥστε being wasted in the eight lines which separate the verb from it. In DEM. liv. 15, μηδ᾽ ὁτιοῦν ἔσται can be taken with εἰ. In SOPH. Tr. 575, ἔσται τοῦτο κηλητήριον, ὥστε μήτιν᾽ εἰσιδὼν στέρξει γυναῖκα κεῖνος ἀντὶ σοῦ πλέον, i.e. a charm to prevent him from loving more than you any other woman whom he may see, ὥστε μή seems to have a final sense with the future, like a final relative. Compare ὥστε μή with the infinitive in PLAT. Gorg. 479 C (quoted in 587, 3).

Macmillan. London, Melbourne, Toronto. 1889. reprint edition:. St. Martin's Press. New York. 1965.

The National Endowment for the Humanities provided support for entering this text.

view as XML

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.