previous next

[315] 315-17 = 21.374-76, except that there “καιομένη, καίωσι” is the best attested reading. Syr.omits 316-17 but ‘there are traces of writing in another hand on the upper margin; probably one or more of the omitted lines.’ 317 is rejected by Bentley and P. Knight, 316-17 by Bekker, Nauck, Christ, Fick, etc. Both lines are perhaps more in place in “Φ”. The triple repetition of forms of “δαίω” is disagreeable; but a reference to 18.227 (whence a splendid effect has been badly copied) would suggest that the remedy is to be found rather in changing “δάηται”, a form not elsewhere found, into “κάηται”. (Hesych. “δάηται: καίεται”.) μαλερῶι, see note on 9.242.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (2 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (2):
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: