previous next

[194] φῶτα and υἱόν in apposition as 21.546, cf. Od. 21.26φῶθ᾽ Ἡρακλῆα,Od. 4.247φωτὶ δέκτηι”, the latter of which passages shews clearly that the addition of “φώς” does not imply anything like ‘manly’ or ‘heroic.’ “ἀνήρ” is used in just the same way, cf. “ἄνδρα Βιήνορα11.92, 5.649; and so “δῶρον ἀνδρὸς ἝκτοροςSoph. Aj. 817.It is needless to say that Pausanias (ii. 26. 10) is wrong in taking it to mean ‘human son’ as opposed to his divine father. See on 2.731.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (6 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (6):
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: