previous next

[585] The neglected “ϝ” of ϝεκών has given rise to sundry conjectures, of which the most plausible is suggested by Heyne “μὴ μὲν ἐμὸν σὺ” (“γε” Brandreth) “ϝεκὼν”. This also avoids the hiatus “τὸ ἐμόν” (for “τοὐμόν”? or “ἀμόν”? see 8.360). Other alterations (“μή τι, μή με, ϝεκών”) are highly improbable, as they lose the characteristic “μέν” of the oath. But in the Games we must not seek anxiously to restore ancient forms.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (1 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (1):
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: