previous next

τὸ δρᾶν: for the art., cp. 118 n.

τίς ἔσται μ᾽ οὑπικωλύσων τάδε; for this use of the fut. partic. with art., cp. O. T. 297.Dindorf is not quite accurate in saying that, after “ἔσται, οὑπικωλύων” ‘would have sufficed,’ and that the poet preferred the fut. partic. only for the sake of correspondence with “κωλύσει”. The fut. partic. was required by Greek idiom, whether the principal verb was to be past, pres., or future. Cp. Xen. An. 2. 4. 5 ἡγησόμενος οὐδεὶς ἔσται”, ‘there will be no one to lead us’ ( Xen. could not have written “ ἡγούμενος”). For the place of μ̓ cp. Soph. O. T. 139ἐκεῖνον κτανών”. The compound ἐπικωλύσων comes after the simple κωλύσει as in Soph. O. T. 566 f. “παρέσχομεν” after “ἔσχετε”, ib. 575 f. “ἐκμάνθαν̓” after “μαθεῖν”. Cp. above, Soph. O. T. 249: and for the converse, Soph. O. T. 911 f. τάδε: for the double acc. (a rare constr. with “κωλύω”), cp. Lys.p. 207 Eἐμέ γε...καὶ μάλα πολλὰ κωλύουσιν” (sc.οἱ γονεῖς”).

hide References (8 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (8):
    • Plato, Lysis, 207e
    • Sophocles, Oedipus Tyrannus, 139
    • Sophocles, Oedipus Tyrannus, 249
    • Sophocles, Oedipus Tyrannus, 297
    • Sophocles, Oedipus Tyrannus, 566
    • Sophocles, Oedipus Tyrannus, 911
    • Sophocles, Philoctetes, 118
    • Xenophon, Anabasis, 2.4.5
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: