previous next

εἰδῶ, which Nauck changes to ἴδω, is in accord with usage (cp. e.g., 678, O. C.889ὅπως εἰδῶ”: Ph.238ὡς εἰδῶ”).

εἰ τοὐμὸν κ.τ.λ. The constr. is, “εἰ μᾶλλον ἀλγεῖς, ὁρῶν τοὐμὸν λωβητον εἶδος, ” (“τὸ”) “κείνης” (“λωβητὸν εἶδος”) “ἐν δίκῃ κακούμενον”. For the omission of “τὸ” before “κείνης”, cp. 929τὸ κεῖσε δεῦρό τ̓” (n.).— κακούμενον as in Ph.228, O. C.261.

Cicero represents this passage by a single verse, Iam cernam, mene an illam potiorem putes. Hence Nauck rejects v. 1069. But the inference is most unsafe, as another instance will show. The passage beginning with “ἰδού” (1079) and ending with “ἐξώρμηκεν” (1089) shrinks, in Cicero's version, to three lines and a half, viz., Videte cuncti: tuque, caelestum sator, | Iace, obsecro, in me vim coruscam fulminis! | Nunc, nunc dolorum anxiferi torquent vertices: | Nunc serpit ardor. Thus Cicero wholly ignores vv. 1085 ff.: he ignores vv. 1080—1084 also, except in so far as their general sense is blended with his version of 1088 f., “δαίνυται...ἐξώρμηκεν”. Yet the Greek text there is clearly sound.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (5 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (5):
    • Sophocles, Oedipus at Colonus, 261
    • Sophocles, Oedipus at Colonus, 889
    • Sophocles, Philoctetes, 228
    • Sophocles, Philoctetes, 238
    • Sophocles, Trachiniae, 929
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: