previous next

καὶ δὴ: O. C.31 n.

χὡ λόγος σημαινέτω. Blaydes writes “ τι λέγεις σήμαινέ μοι”: Nauck too (cr. n.) thinks the text corrupt, chiefly because “σός” is absent. But cp. Eur. Hipp.341 f. “ΦΑ. τρίτη δ᾽ ἐγὼ δύστηνος ὡς ἀπόλλυμαι”. | “ΤΡ. ἔκ τοι πέπληγμαι: ποῖ προβήσεται λόγος; For the verb, cp. 598σήμαινε”. Apitz cites Plat. Gorg. 511 Bὡς λόγος σημαίνει”: but the sense there is different (‘as our argument indicates’).

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (4 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (4):
    • Euripides, Hippolytus, 341
    • Plato, Gorgias, 511b
    • Sophocles, Oedipus at Colonus, 31
    • Sophocles, Trachiniae, 598
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: