δείκνυμι δ̓: cp. on 146 “δηλῶ δ̓”. The usu. constr. is “ψεύδειν τινά τινος”, while “ψεύδειν τινά τι” is comparatively rare: and so here οὐδέν seems to be adv., while ὧν (=“τούτων ἅ”) is gen. after ἐψευσάμην. So I should take Plat. Legg. 921A “τὴν τιμὴν τῶν ἔργων ὀφειλέτω ὧν ἂν τὸν ἐκδόντα ψεύσηται”, “"of which he has disappointed the contractor,"”—though an attraction of acc. into gen. is equally possible. ὤμοσα: 1040.
This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.