As most editors since Elmsley have allowed, the MS. οὔ τι ... οὔτε cannot be right. And οὔ τι ... οὐδέ is clearly more forcible than οὔτε ... οὔτε. λάχωσι: this verb with gen. is less common than with accus., but is well attested not only in poetry but in prose, as Plat. Legg. 775E “τιμῆς ἐὰν τῆς προσηκούσης...λαγχάνῃ” (Krüger 1. 47. 14). It is surely needless, then, to adopt Brunck's τύχωσι. τοῦδε, very rare for τοῦδ᾽ ἀνδρός as =ἐμοῦ: so “τῆσδε” = “ἐμοῦ” Tr. 305, “τῷδε” =“ἐμοί” ib. 1012. συμμάχου predicate; cp. 1482 “ἐναισίου δὲ σοῦ τύχοιμι”, and 1486.
This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.