previous next

[427] ἐυηγενέος, an obviously wrong form, as the “-η-” cannot be explained. “ἠϋγενέος” (P. Knight) is condemned by the rule that “ἠϋ-” is found in compounds only under the stress of absolute metrical necessity. This allows the nom. “ἠϋγενής” (Hymn. Ven. 94) but not the gen., for “εὐγενέος” is a possible form. See note on 7.41. But no doubt the right form is “εὐηφενέος”, wealthy, which was a variant read by Rhianos and Aph.on 23.81, where see note. This is regularly formed from “ἄφενος”. The corruption is a very early one, for we find “εὐηγενέος” in Hymn. Ven. 229, where the sense is clearly noble.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: