previous next

[506] Ἀστυάναξ, for the etymological introduction of the name cf. 6.402-3, with note there. The hyperbaton by which the name is put in the nom., as though it belonged to the principal clause, is curious; and is evidently not to be compared with the common idiom by which the subject of the rel. clause is made the object of the principal (“ἤιδεε ἀδελφεόν, ὡς ἐπονεῖτο”, etc.). It is easy enough to conjecture “Ἀστυάναχθ᾽”, but this is no better.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (1 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (1):
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: