previous next

[667] φθίσθαι, aor. where we should have expected the fut. It has been suggested that 666 may be taken parenthetically, so that “φθίσθαι” will be epexegetic of “κῆρα” above. But see note on 3.28; it is quite possible here to take “φθίσθαι” with “ἔειπεν” as a simple complement or object of the verb, without reference to time; ‘announced to him his perishing,’ just as we have “νόστον σοῦ πατρὸς σάφα εἰπέμεν” in Od. 17.106, cf. also Od. 4.561σοὶ δ᾽ οὐ θέσφατόν ἐστι . . θανέειν”. The scholiasts naturally compare the “διχθάδιαι κῆρες” offered to Achilles, 9.411.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (3 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (3):
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: