previous next

[232] The neglected “ϝ” in εἰσανιδών is remarkable in so ancient a passage; Bentley conj. “εἰσορόων”. The line is of course not indispensable. τερπικέραυνον, see on 11.773, and compare Pindar's “ἐλασίβροντα παῖ Ῥεᾶς” (fr. 144 Schröder).

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: