previous next

[337] “Φήμιε, πολλὰ γὰρ κ.τ.λ.” It is a very characteristic feature of Homeric syntax, to arrange clauses in the simple order in which they come into the mind, instead of combining and interlacing them as in the periodic structure of later Greek. This principle shows itself very markedly in the way in which the explanatory clause precedes the clause to be explained. Such explanatory clause may be introduced with “ἐπεί”, as in Od.13. 4

Ὀδυσεῦ, ἐπεὶ ἵκευ ἐμὸν ποτὶ χαλκοβατὲς δῶ”.

ὑψερεφὲς, τῷ σ᾽ οὔ τι πάλιν πλαγχθέντα ὀίω

ἂψ ἀπονοστήσειν”.

But here there is a real syntactical connection between the clauses, by the relatival force of “ἐπεί”. Often, however, the explanatory clause is introduced quite parenthetically with “γάρ” as in the present passage, as if in the passage quoted above we had found “ Ὀδυσεῦ, ἵκευ γὰρ ἐμὸν ποτὶ δῶμα . . τῷ κ.τ.λ.” For other instances of this construction cp. Od. 5. 29; 8. 159; 10. 190, 226, 337, 383, 501; 12. 154, 208, 320; 14. 402; 15. 545; 17. 78; 19. 350; Il. 10. 61; 15. 201; 17. 221; 23. 156, 890; 24. 334. Note here the form οἶδας (for “οἶδ-θα, οἶσθα”) only found in this passage, and twice in the Hymns.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (21 total)
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: