previous next

[304] λελόγχασιν. See crit. note. For the quantity of the “α^” see Od.7. 114 on “πεφύκα^σι”, and cp. Monro, H. G. §§ 5 Od., 7.Among other points which suggest a late origin for the whole passage we may note that τὴν Τυνδαρέου παράκοιτιν (sup.) seems to be a use of the demonstratival pronoun, or article, that is quite post-Homeric. We might quote “Θάμυριν τὸν Θρήικα Il.2. 595 as the nearest parallel; but not “ Ἰφίκλοιο πάις” (as Krüger) Il.13. 698, for there is the emphatic demonstrative, referring back to “ μέν”, ib. 694. Lauer (Hom. Quaest. 51) says well, ‘Vocabulum “τήν” articuli quasi vicarium improbandum est, cum a versibus 260, 266, 305, quamvis eadem in iis sit coniunctio, vocula ista “τήν” absit.’

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (4 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (4):
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: