previous next

[40] οὐτάμενοι. See on Od. 4.807. Aristarchus and Herodian both decide in favour of the proparoxytone accent, considering the form to be the present participle of the passive. Cp. Et. Mag. 46. 4 “τὸ δὲ οὐτάμενος καὶ ἐληλάμενος Ἡρωδιανὸς οὔ φησι κατὰ πάθος γίγνεσθαι προπαροξύτονα ἀπὸ τοῦ οὐτασμένος καὶ ἐληλασμένος, ἀλλ᾽ ἀπὸ τῶν ἐς μ_ι_ τῶν τε οὔτημι καὶ ἐλήλημι. εἰσὶ δὲ ἐνεστῶτες” (present), “ὡς ἵστημι, ἵσταμαι, ἱστάμενος”. Pamphilus is said to have written these words paroxytone, as if perfect passive participles syncopated. But “οὐτάμενοι” is better described as a participle of the non-thematic aorist of the middle voice with passive signification: similar forms being the infinitives “οὐτάμεν Il.5. 132, and “οὐτάμεναι Od.9. 301; 19.419. οὐτάμενοι is thus parallel to “κατακτάμενος Od.16. 106; compare “ἔκτα Od.1. 300, and “κτάμεναι Od.10. 295.Such aorist participles have almost a purely adjectival force, as “φθίμενος Il.8. 359, “ἀλιτήμενος Od.4. 807, “ὀνήμενος Od.2. 33, “ἐυκτίμενος Il.2. 501, etc.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (10 total)
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: