previous next

[402] δώμασιν οἷσιν. As Buttm. says (Lexil. p. 251 note) the choice between “σοῖσιν” and “οἷσιν” turns on a few passages; the question to be settled being whether “ὅς” (the possessive pronoun) is flexible enough to refer to first and second, as well as to third person. On the passage, Od.9. 28οὐ γὰρ ἐγώ γε

ἧς γαίης δύναμαι γλυκερώτερον ἄλλο ἰδέσθαι”, the Schol. remarks, “οὐκ εἶπεν ἐμῆς ἵνα καθολικώτερος γένηται λόγος περὶ τῆς τῶν καθ᾽ ἕκαστον ἀνθρώπων πατρίδος”. In Il.19. 174σὺ δὲ φρεσὶν ἧσιν ἰανθῇς”, Wolf writes “φρεσὶ σῇσι”, comparing it with the corresponding lines, Il.14. 221, 264; 16. 36; etc. The passage Od.13. 320φρεσὶν ᾗσιν ἔχων δεδαϊγμένον ἦτορ”, where “ᾗσιν” must stand for “ἐμῇσιν”, has been rejected from very remote antiquity. But the present passage Wolf has left untouched, retaining “οἷσιν” as conveying the sense of ‘own.’ Eustath. also reads “οἷσιν”. In Hesiod. Opp. 381, we have “σοὶ δ᾽ εἰ πλούτου θυμὸς ἐέλδεται ἐν φρεσὶν ᾗσιν” in nearly all MSS., and Göttling retains it; but it is doubtful if the line is genuine. See an account of the whole question in Monro, H. G. § 255.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (5 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (5):
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: